Skip to content
Permalink
Browse files
Added Coursework Template
  • Loading branch information
@aa9863
aa9863 committed Jul 27, 2021
1 parent ac5300c commit 0def0a2870a7cf0177c88e36fdd7d243b999053d
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 163 additions and 5 deletions.
42 custom_theme/coursework.html
View file
@@ -1,8 +1,40 @@
{% extends "base.html" %}

{% block scripts %}
{{ super() }} {# Call super to load the parent version of this #}
{% block content %}

{# Then add our part of the script to the end of it #}
<script src="{{ 'assets/javascripts/themetoggle.js' | url }}"></script>
{% endblock %}
<h1>{{ page.meta.title }}</h1>

<h3>Submission Informtion</h3>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Handout Date</td>
<td>{{ page.meta.handout }}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Due Date</td>
<td>{{ page.meta.due }}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Estimated Effort</td>
<td>{{ page.meta.effort }}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Percentage of Module Mark</td>
<td>{{ page.meta.percentage }}</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>ILO's Assessed</h3>

<ul>
{% for item in page.meta.ilos %}
<li>{{ item }}</li>
{% endfor %}
</ul>


{{ super() }} {# Call super to load the parent version of this #}

{% endblock %}
123 docs/assessment/ExampleCW.md
View file
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
---
#remarkable.exe .\Report.md -t coursework/CourseworkBrief.jinja2 -o Report.html
# Template Stuff
#template: coursework/CourseworkBrief.jinja2
template: coursework.html
# Fields for the coursework
module_title: "Ethical Hacking 1"
module_code: 245CT
module_leader: Dan Goldsmith

cohort: Jan
handout: 25/1/2021
due: 4/3/2021

title: "CW 1: Vulnerability Report"
type: Report
group: false
effort: 20 Hours
percentage: 40%

submit_via: Moodle
feedback_date:
feedback_method: Individual Feedback Via Turnitin / Aula


wordlimit: 2000
short: Vulnerability Assessment Report
ilos:
- 1. Describe and demonstrate the aspects of penetration testing and
vulnerability assessment relating to technical implementation, common
practices, legality and ethics
- 2. Identify, describe and compare a range of different types of digital
security threat and indicate how they are exploited and mitigated
- 3. Use appropriate tools to discover the structure of a network and the
characteristics of the devices connected to it
---

# Task and Mark Distribution

There are many aspects to Ethical Hacking. Aside from the obvious technical
skills, you will also be required to report on penetration tests.

The ability to report your findings, contextualise threats within the wider
cyber security field, and reflect upon the process is a key skill.
In this coursework, you are required to write a report on the topics studied
during the lab sessions for the module.

## Report Requirements

You will need to produce a report on **TWO** of the weekly topics. This can
include

- Reconnaissance
- Privilege Escalation
- Any of the Web vulnerabilities (for example XSS or SQLi).

## Topic Discussion

For each of the topics you need to write a technical discussion of the topic
including:

1. Introduction to the topic: What it is, and why it is of interest in Cyber security
2. Discussion of this topic including:
- Technical / Practical implementation of the topic (How does this work)
- Example of the topic in the "Real world"
- Discussion of the topic in the wider security context (What does it mean
in terms of security, how common is it, how "dangerous" is the vulnerability)
3. Considerations for mitigating this problem in general.
4. Social, Legal and Ethical considerations with this particular topic

## Marking Scheme

| Element | Marks Available |
| ---------------------------------- | --------------- |
| **Introduction / Conclusions** | **10** |
| **Topic 1** | **40** |
| (Consisting of) | |
| - Technical Implementation | (10) |
| - Context / Example | (15) |
| - Legal and Ethical Considerations | (5) |
| - Mitigation | (10) |
| **Topic 2** | **40** |
| (Marks as Topic 1) | |
| **Report Structure** | 10 |


## Suggested Report Structure

The recommended structure for the report is

1. Introduction
2. Discussion of topic 1 (see above)
3. Discussion of topic 2 (see above)
4. Summary
5. References

## IMPORTANT NOTE / TIP FOR SUCCESS:

Remember, this assignment is intended to assess your wider understanding of the
subject.

The bulk of the marks are awarded for the discussion element (rather
than the technical aspects). Rather than focus purely on the technical aspects
(the how), you are expected to examine WHAT this means in terms of security, and
the legal and ethical context. In many of these topics there is no clear cut
answer, so remember to strengthen your argument with relevant citations from
appropriate sources.


## Marking Matrix

| Grade | Mark | Description |
|----------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| No submission | 0 | No work submitted |
| Fail | 0-25 | Clear failure demonstrating little understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues. Minimal evidence of research and use of established methodologies and incomplete knowledge of the area. Serious and fundamental errors and aspects missing. No evidence of research. |
| Near Fail | 25-39 | Very limited understanding of relevant theories, concepts and. Little evidence of research and use of established methodologies. Some relevant material will be present. Deficiencies evident in analysis. Fundamental errors and some misunderstanding likely to be present. |
| Pass | 40-49 | Meets the learning outcomes with a basic understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues.. Demonstrates an understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories sufficient to deal with concepts. Assessment may be incomplete and with some errors. Research scope sufficient to evidence use of some established methodologies. Some irrelevant material likely to be present |
| 2:2 | 50-59 | Good understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues with some critical analysis. Research undertaken accurately using established methodologies, enquiry beyond that recommended may be present. Some errors may be present and some inclusion of irrelevant material. Good understanding, with evidence of breadth and depth, of knowledge and subject-specific theories with indications of originality and autonomy |
| 2:1 | 60-69 | Very good work demonstrating strong understanding of theories, concepts and issues with clear critical analysis. Thorough research, using established methodologies accurately, beyond the recommended minimum with little, if any, irrelevant material present. Very good understanding, evidencing breadth and depth, of knowledge and subject-specific theories with some originality and autonomy. |
| First | 70-79 | Excellent work with clear evidence of understanding, creativity and critical/analytical skills. Thorough research well beyond the minimum recommended using methodologies beyond the usual range. Excellent understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories with evidence of considerable originality and autonomy. |
| Outstanding | 80-90 | Outstanding work with high degree of understanding, creativity and critical/analytical skills. Outstanding understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories. Evidence of outstanding research well beyond minimum recommended using a range of methodologies. Demonstrates creative flair, originality and autonomy. |
| Exceptional | 90-100 | Exceptional work with very high degree of understanding, creativity and critical/analytic skills. Evidence of exceptional research well beyond minimum recommended using a range of methodologies. . Exceptional understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories. Demonstrates creative flair, a high degree of originality and autonomy. |
| | | |
3 mkdocs.yml
View file
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ nav:
- Home Lab Setup: guides/LabSetup.md
- Docker Guide: guides/DockerGuide.md
- Github Labs: guides/LabGithub.md
- Assesment:
- Assessment Example: assessment/ExampleCW.md




0 comments on commit 0def0a2

Please sign in to comment.