Skip to content
Permalink
Browse files
update
  • Loading branch information
carey committed Jun 16, 2020
1 parent 7e6dff6 commit 3059dd923b392faac301f036486b3c90f9a0cba5
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 439 additions and 26 deletions.
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
# -*- mode: org -*-
#+TITLE: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act:
#+AUTHOR: Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah
* setup :noexport:
#+OPTIONS: reveal_center:t reveal_progress:t reveal_history:t reveal_control:t
#+OPTIONS: reveal_mathjax:t reveal_rolling_links:t reveal_keyboard:t reveal_overview:t num:nil
#+OPTIONS: reveal_width:1200 reveal_height:800
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil num:nil H:2 ^:{}
#+REVEAL_MARGIN: 0.2
#+REVEAL_MIN_SCALE: 0.5
#+REVEAL_MAX_SCALE: 2.5
#+REVEAL_TRANS: none
#+REVEAL_THEME: night
#+REVEAL_HLEVEL: 999
#+REVEAL_EXTRA_CSS: css/presentation.css
#+REVEAL_ROOT: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/reveal.js/3.0.0/
#+STARTUP: showeverything
# Licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
# International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020
* The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
**
- The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA was brought into law in the US
in 1998.
- By implementing two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property
Organization it criminalizes production and dissemination of technology,
devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to
copyrighted works.
- In short, in seeks to prevent the diseminination, *by any means*, of original
copyrighted works by anyone but the copyright holder.
- This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or DVD's.
**
- It's legal to make a copy of any form of media you own, for personal
use. However, it is *technically* not legal to circumvent copy protection
measures.
- Since these are routinely used on almost all digital media, most people seem to assume
the personal use clause no longer exists.
**
- Video clips from any movie can be used when creating another video, and this
is most often seen on platforms such as Youtube.
- However such use often causes those videos to be claimed by the original
content creator, even when usage falls within the realm of fair use.
**
- Music sampling, if the result is either sold or placed online, will be a
target for litigation, as sampled songs became so popular, remixing so much
older music, the copyright holders of that music started taking the samplers
to court
- Sometimes these cases resulted in them demanding all of the profits [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Upright_Music,_Ltd._v._Warner_Bros._Records_Inc.][Grand
Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc.]], [[https://www.ip-watch.org/2016/06/28/us-courts-split-on-legality-of-music-sampling/][US Courts Split On Legality
Of Music Sampling]]., [[https://flypaper.soundfly.com/discover/5-music-copyright-cases-every-songwriter-should-know-about/][5 Music Copyright Cases Every Songwriter Should Know About]]
** Is The DMCA Fair
- One thing it set out to do was remove fair use, because fair use isn't
profitable.
- I own a good number of DVDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to
take hold I would be forced to replace my entire collection each time
technology advanced to the point my current collection became unusable. This
happened to my audio cassettes, and to my video tapes (although both of those
wore out through re-use, so we'ren't that good anyway).
**
- Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DVD boxset, can't be so easily
replaced. Others got their soundtracks replaced because obtaining the rights
to the original music used again would cost too much for such obscure shows.
- If they get re-released at all, why do this when there's streaming now.
- Much better to have a reguler income from customers who will be impressed by
'hundreds of shows available', but likely only watch the new ones.
**
- Without private copy rights, Lots of these shows wouldn't be available. Once
streaming replaces personal ownership completely, there won't be any option to
flick through your old collection. That has more appeal than you might think.
- Mind you, DVD itself is a dead format, private *digital* copies are the future,
and I think this is what most concerns copyright protection people, since
digital copies can be shared.
- However, so could filmstock (more on this later), and audiotape, then
videotape and DVD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the
music, movie or television industries. Producing terrible content no-one's
interested in buying's done most of the harm.
** Let's talk about Hollywood
- One of the groups that wield the DMCA most is Hollywood, using it to protect
their movies, (currently, for some bizarre reason, from being used in Youtube
videos which would actually raise the profile of their products, but I don't
get how they work, which they either take over, monetise or take down).
- Disney in particular have had US Copyright extended *specifically* to enable
them to retain ownership of their Mickey Mouse character. Loads of content
would now be in the public domain were it not for Disney's desire to retain
ownership of the mouse.

**
- What's really interesting is how Hollywood started. A group of film makers ran
all the way to California (a long distance at the time) to get away from this
guy, Thomas Edison, and his fim camera patents and copyrights, because his
rights enforcement was so severe it prevented them from making any significant
profit.
[[file:img/Thomas_Edison.jpg]]
**
- Yet at the same time Edison took the entire catalogue of pioneering french
film maker Georges Méliès, now known as the pioneer of film special effects,
inventing many of those we know today more than a hundred years ago.
- By releasing his entire catalogue of movies and taking credit, he stole
millions of dollars from Méliès. Lacking the financial buffer this would have
given him this, among too many pressures to list here, caused him to die
bankrupt [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_M%C3%A9li%C3%A8s][Wikipedia page on Méliès]]
[[file:img/George_Melies.jpg]]
**
- One could make the argument the DMCA exist because the US has learned from
their mistakes, but as these mistakes seem to be ongoing, with the oppression
of new artists, and software developers trying to create innovative products,
I doubt this the case.
- Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen, in spite of being a billionaire, has filed
patent and copyright infringement cases against Apple, AOL, Facebook, Google,
and anyone his *definitely not a patent troll* company can find who might be
infringing on one of the many thousands of patents they've managed to buy up.
- Since buying thousands of vaguely worded software patents and then suing
companies with them is exactly how patent trolls behave, it's kind of
difficult to think this isn't exactly what they are.



** Obligatory XKCD
file:img/DMCA.png
- Copyright:
- Mirrored to avoid bandwidth stealing
** Licence for this work
- Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020
- (Licence does not cover linked images owned by other content creators)
@@ -27,18 +27,18 @@
<body>
<div class="reveal">
<div class="slides">
<section id="sec-title-slide"><h1 class="title">The Digital Millennium Copyright Act:</h1><h2 class="author">Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah</h2><p class="date">Created: 2020-06-16 Tue 12:30</p>
<section id="sec-title-slide"><h1 class="title">The Digital Millennium Copyright Act:</h1><h2 class="author">Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah</h2><p class="date">Created: 2020-06-16 Tue 12:46</p>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h2 id="orgf4eeed2">The Digital Millennium Copyright Act</h2>
<div class="outline-text-2" id="text-orgf4eeed2">
<h2 id="org6ba107a">The Digital Millennium Copyright Act</h2>
<div class="outline-text-2" id="text-org6ba107a">
</div>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org1de56db"></h3>
<h3 id="orgcad0f76"></h3>
<ul>
<li>The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA was brought into law in the US
in 1998.</li>
@@ -48,14 +48,14 @@ <h3 id="org1de56db"></h3>
copyrighted works.</li>
<li>In short, in seeks to prevent the diseminination, <b>by any means</b>, of original
copyrighted works by anyone but the copyright holder.</li>
<li>This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or dvd's.</li>
<li>This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or DVD's.</li>

</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org7d23440"></h3>
<h3 id="org73ceba8"></h3>
<ul>
<li>It's legal to make a copy of any form of media you own, for personal
use. However, it is <b>technically</b> not legal to circumvent copy protection
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ <h3 id="org7d23440"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="orgef2a2eb"></h3>
<h3 id="org2e17fef"></h3>
<ul>
<li>Video clips from any movie can be used when creating another video, and this
is most often seen on platforms such as Youtube.</li>
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ <h3 id="orgef2a2eb"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="orge1c8ba8"></h3>
<h3 id="orgfeb7918"></h3>
<ul>
<li>Music sampling, if the result is either sold or placed online, will be a
target for litigation, as sampled songs became so popular, remixing so much
@@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ <h3 id="orge1c8ba8"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="orga88934d">Is The DMCA Fair</h3>
<h3 id="orgb21a13b">Is The DMCA Fair</h3>
<ul>
<li>One thing it set out to do was remove fair use, because fair use isn't
profitable.</li>
<li>I own a good number of DvDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to
<li>I own a good number of DVDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to
take hold I would be forced to replace my entire collection each time
technology advanced to the point my current collection became unusable. This
happened to my audio cassettes, and to my video tapes (although both of those
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ <h3 id="orga88934d">Is The DMCA Fair</h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org59fcd5f"></h3>
<h3 id="orgcb60a85"></h3>
<ul>
<li>Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DvD boxset, can't be so easily
<li>Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DVD boxset, can't be so easily
replaced. Others got their soundtracks replaced because obtaining the rights
to the original music used again would cost too much for such obscure shows.</li>
<li>If they get re-released at all, why do this when there's streaming now.</li>
@@ -124,16 +124,16 @@ <h3 id="org59fcd5f"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org044bd98"></h3>
<h3 id="org5d716d2"></h3>
<ul>
<li>Without private copy rights, Lots of these shows wouldn't be available. Once
streaming replaces personal ownership completely, there won't be any option to
flick through your old collection. That has more appeal than you might think.</li>
<li>Mind you, DvD itself is a dead format, private <b>digital</b> copies are the future,
<li>Mind you, DVD itself is a dead format, private <b>digital</b> copies are the future,
and I think this is what most concerns copyright protection people, since
digital copies can be shared.</li>
<li>However, so could filmstock (more on this later), and audiotape, then
videotape and DvD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the
videotape and DVD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the
music, movie or television industries. Producing terrible content no-one's
interested in buying's done most of the harm.</li>

@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ <h3 id="org044bd98"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org87f2872">Let's talk about Hollywood</h3>
<h3 id="org2c6e9d9">Let's talk about Hollywood</h3>
<ul>
<li>One of the groups that wield the DMCA most is Hollywood, using it to protect
their movies, (currently, for some bizarre reason, from being used in Youtube
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ <h3 id="org87f2872">Let's talk about Hollywood</h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org502fc65"></h3>
<h3 id="orgaee9949"></h3>
<ul>
<li>What's really interesting is how Hollywood started. A group of film makers ran
all the way to California (a long distance at the time) to get away from this
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ <h3 id="org502fc65"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org987122f"></h3>
<h3 id="orgfcbfa1d"></h3>
<ul>
<li>Yet at the same time Edison took the entire catalogue of pioneering french
film maker Georges Méliès, now known as the pioneer of film special effects,
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ <h3 id="org987122f"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org0d1c52c"></h3>
<h3 id="org7d28a82"></h3>
<ul>
<li>One could make the argument the DMCA exist because the US has learned from
their mistakes, but as these mistakes seem to be ongoing, with the oppression
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ <h3 id="org0d1c52c"></h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="org76805a3">Obligatory XKCD</h3>
<h3 id="org7b87c8c">Obligatory XKCD</h3>

<div class="figure">
<p><img src="img/DMCA.png" alt="DMCA.png" />
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ <h3 id="org76805a3">Obligatory XKCD</h3>
</section>
<section>
<section id="slide-sec-">
<h3 id="orga256023">Licence for this work</h3>
<h3 id="org551a774">Licence for this work</h3>
<ul>
<li>Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020</li>

0 comments on commit 3059dd9

Please sign in to comment.