From 3059dd923b392faac301f036486b3c90f9a0cba5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: carey Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:47:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] update --- 20-21/Lectures/#DMCA.org# | 124 ++++++++++++++++ 20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html | 42 +++--- 20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html~ | 289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 20-21/Lectures/DMCA.org | 10 +- 4 files changed, 439 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) create mode 100644 20-21/Lectures/#DMCA.org# create mode 100644 20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html~ diff --git a/20-21/Lectures/#DMCA.org# b/20-21/Lectures/#DMCA.org# new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cadf7be --- /dev/null +++ b/20-21/Lectures/#DMCA.org# @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +# -*- mode: org -*- +#+TITLE: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: +#+AUTHOR: Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah +* setup :noexport: +#+OPTIONS: reveal_center:t reveal_progress:t reveal_history:t reveal_control:t +#+OPTIONS: reveal_mathjax:t reveal_rolling_links:t reveal_keyboard:t reveal_overview:t num:nil +#+OPTIONS: reveal_width:1200 reveal_height:800 +#+OPTIONS: toc:nil num:nil H:2 ^:{} +#+REVEAL_MARGIN: 0.2 +#+REVEAL_MIN_SCALE: 0.5 +#+REVEAL_MAX_SCALE: 2.5 +#+REVEAL_TRANS: none +#+REVEAL_THEME: night +#+REVEAL_HLEVEL: 999 +#+REVEAL_EXTRA_CSS: css/presentation.css +#+REVEAL_ROOT: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/reveal.js/3.0.0/ +#+STARTUP: showeverything +# Licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 +# International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020 +* The Digital Millennium Copyright Act +** +- The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA was brought into law in the US + in 1998. +- By implementing two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property + Organization it criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, + devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to + copyrighted works. +- In short, in seeks to prevent the diseminination, *by any means*, of original + copyrighted works by anyone but the copyright holder. +- This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or DVD's. +** +- It's legal to make a copy of any form of media you own, for personal + use. However, it is *technically* not legal to circumvent copy protection + measures. +- Since these are routinely used on almost all digital media, most people seem to assume + the personal use clause no longer exists. +** +- Video clips from any movie can be used when creating another video, and this + is most often seen on platforms such as Youtube. +- However such use often causes those videos to be claimed by the original + content creator, even when usage falls within the realm of fair use. +** +- Music sampling, if the result is either sold or placed online, will be a + target for litigation, as sampled songs became so popular, remixing so much + older music, the copyright holders of that music started taking the samplers + to court +- Sometimes these cases resulted in them demanding all of the profits [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Upright_Music,_Ltd._v._Warner_Bros._Records_Inc.][Grand + Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc.]], [[https://www.ip-watch.org/2016/06/28/us-courts-split-on-legality-of-music-sampling/][US Courts Split On Legality + Of Music Sampling]]., [[https://flypaper.soundfly.com/discover/5-music-copyright-cases-every-songwriter-should-know-about/][5 Music Copyright Cases Every Songwriter Should Know About]] +** Is The DMCA Fair +- One thing it set out to do was remove fair use, because fair use isn't + profitable. +- I own a good number of DVDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to + take hold I would be forced to replace my entire collection each time + technology advanced to the point my current collection became unusable. This + happened to my audio cassettes, and to my video tapes (although both of those + wore out through re-use, so we'ren't that good anyway). +** +- Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DVD boxset, can't be so easily + replaced. Others got their soundtracks replaced because obtaining the rights + to the original music used again would cost too much for such obscure shows. +- If they get re-released at all, why do this when there's streaming now. +- Much better to have a reguler income from customers who will be impressed by + 'hundreds of shows available', but likely only watch the new ones. +** +- Without private copy rights, Lots of these shows wouldn't be available. Once + streaming replaces personal ownership completely, there won't be any option to + flick through your old collection. That has more appeal than you might think. +- Mind you, DVD itself is a dead format, private *digital* copies are the future, + and I think this is what most concerns copyright protection people, since + digital copies can be shared. +- However, so could filmstock (more on this later), and audiotape, then + videotape and DVD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the + music, movie or television industries. Producing terrible content no-one's + interested in buying's done most of the harm. +** Let's talk about Hollywood +- One of the groups that wield the DMCA most is Hollywood, using it to protect + their movies, (currently, for some bizarre reason, from being used in Youtube + videos which would actually raise the profile of their products, but I don't + get how they work, which they either take over, monetise or take down). +- Disney in particular have had US Copyright extended *specifically* to enable + them to retain ownership of their Mickey Mouse character. Loads of content + would now be in the public domain were it not for Disney's desire to retain + ownership of the mouse. + +** +- What's really interesting is how Hollywood started. A group of film makers ran + all the way to California (a long distance at the time) to get away from this + guy, Thomas Edison, and his fim camera patents and copyrights, because his + rights enforcement was so severe it prevented them from making any significant + profit. +[[file:img/Thomas_Edison.jpg]] +** +- Yet at the same time Edison took the entire catalogue of pioneering french + film maker Georges Méliès, now known as the pioneer of film special effects, + inventing many of those we know today more than a hundred years ago. +- By releasing his entire catalogue of movies and taking credit, he stole + millions of dollars from Méliès. Lacking the financial buffer this would have + given him this, among too many pressures to list here, caused him to die + bankrupt [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_M%C3%A9li%C3%A8s][Wikipedia page on Méliès]] +[[file:img/George_Melies.jpg]] +** +- One could make the argument the DMCA exist because the US has learned from + their mistakes, but as these mistakes seem to be ongoing, with the oppression + of new artists, and software developers trying to create innovative products, + I doubt this the case. +- Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen, in spite of being a billionaire, has filed + patent and copyright infringement cases against Apple, AOL, Facebook, Google, + and anyone his *definitely not a patent troll* company can find who might be + infringing on one of the many thousands of patents they've managed to buy up. +- Since buying thousands of vaguely worded software patents and then suing + companies with them is exactly how patent trolls behave, it's kind of + difficult to think this isn't exactly what they are. + + + +** Obligatory XKCD +file:img/DMCA.png +- Copyright: +- Mirrored to avoid bandwidth stealing +** Licence for this work +- Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 + International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020 +- (Licence does not cover linked images owned by other content creators) diff --git a/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html b/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html index 421e677..410f7e7 100644 --- a/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html +++ b/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html @@ -27,18 +27,18 @@
-

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act:

Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah

Created: 2020-06-16 Tue 12:30

+

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act:

Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah

Created: 2020-06-16 Tue 12:46

-

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act

-
+

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act

+
-

+

  • The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA was brought into law in the US in 1998.
    • @@ -48,14 +48,14 @@

    copyrighted works.
  • In short, in seeks to prevent the diseminination, by any means, of original copyrighted works by anyone but the copyright holder.
    • -
  • This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or dvd's.
    • +
  • This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or DVD's.
-

+

  • It's legal to make a copy of any form of media you own, for personal use. However, it is technically not legal to circumvent copy protection @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@

-

+

  • Video clips from any movie can be used when creating another video, and this is most often seen on platforms such as Youtube.
    • @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@

-

+

  • Music sampling, if the result is either sold or placed online, will be a target for litigation, as sampled songs became so popular, remixing so much @@ -95,11 +95,11 @@

-

Is The DMCA Fair

+

Is The DMCA Fair

  • One thing it set out to do was remove fair use, because fair use isn't profitable.
    • -
  • I own a good number of DvDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to +
  • I own a good number of DVDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to take hold I would be forced to replace my entire collection each time technology advanced to the point my current collection became unusable. This happened to my audio cassettes, and to my video tapes (although both of those @@ -110,9 +110,9 @@

    Is The DMCA Fair

-

+

    -
  • Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DvD boxset, can't be so easily +
  • Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DVD boxset, can't be so easily replaced. Others got their soundtracks replaced because obtaining the rights to the original music used again would cost too much for such obscure shows.
  • If they get re-released at all, why do this when there's streaming now.
    • @@ -124,16 +124,16 @@

-

+

  • Without private copy rights, Lots of these shows wouldn't be available. Once streaming replaces personal ownership completely, there won't be any option to flick through your old collection. That has more appeal than you might think.
    • -
  • Mind you, DvD itself is a dead format, private digital copies are the future, +
  • Mind you, DVD itself is a dead format, private digital copies are the future, and I think this is what most concerns copyright protection people, since digital copies can be shared.
  • However, so could filmstock (more on this later), and audiotape, then -videotape and DvD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the +videotape and DVD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the music, movie or television industries. Producing terrible content no-one's interested in buying's done most of the harm.
    • @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@

-

Let's talk about Hollywood

+

Let's talk about Hollywood

  • One of the groups that wield the DMCA most is Hollywood, using it to protect their movies, (currently, for some bizarre reason, from being used in Youtube @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@

    Let's talk about Hollywood

-

+

  • What's really interesting is how Hollywood started. A group of film makers ran all the way to California (a long distance at the time) to get away from this @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@

-

+

  • Yet at the same time Edison took the entire catalogue of pioneering french film maker Georges Méliès, now known as the pioneer of film special effects, @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@

-

+

  • One could make the argument the DMCA exist because the US has learned from their mistakes, but as these mistakes seem to be ongoing, with the oppression @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@

-

Obligatory XKCD

+

Obligatory XKCD

DMCA.png @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@

Obligatory XKCD

-

Licence for this work

+

Licence for this work

  • Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020
    • diff --git a/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html~ b/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html~ new file mode 100644 index 0000000..421e677 --- /dev/null +++ b/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.html~ @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@ + + + + +The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
    +
    +

    The Digital Millennium Copyright Act:

    Dr Carey Pridgeon, Dr Nazaraf Shah

    Created: 2020-06-16 Tue 12:30

    +
    +
    +
    +

    The Digital Millennium Copyright Act

    +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA was brought into law in the US +in 1998.
      • +
    • By implementing two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property +Organization it criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, +devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to +copyrighted works.
      • +
    • In short, in seeks to prevent the diseminination, by any means, of original +copyrighted works by anyone but the copyright holder.
      • +
    • This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or dvd's.
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • It's legal to make a copy of any form of media you own, for personal +use. However, it is technically not legal to circumvent copy protection +measures.
      • +
    • Since these are routinely used on almost all digital media, most people seem to assume +the personal use clause no longer exists.
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • Video clips from any movie can be used when creating another video, and this +is most often seen on platforms such as Youtube.
      • +
    • However such use often causes those videos to be claimed by the original +content creator, even when usage falls within the realm of fair use.
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    + +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    Is The DMCA Fair

    +
      +
    • One thing it set out to do was remove fair use, because fair use isn't +profitable.
      • +
    • I own a good number of DvDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to +take hold I would be forced to replace my entire collection each time +technology advanced to the point my current collection became unusable. This +happened to my audio cassettes, and to my video tapes (although both of those +wore out through re-use, so we'ren't that good anyway).
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DvD boxset, can't be so easily +replaced. Others got their soundtracks replaced because obtaining the rights +to the original music used again would cost too much for such obscure shows.
      • +
    • If they get re-released at all, why do this when there's streaming now.
      • +
    • Much better to have a reguler income from customers who will be impressed by +'hundreds of shows available', but likely only watch the new ones.
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • Without private copy rights, Lots of these shows wouldn't be available. Once +streaming replaces personal ownership completely, there won't be any option to +flick through your old collection. That has more appeal than you might think.
      • +
    • Mind you, DvD itself is a dead format, private digital copies are the future, +and I think this is what most concerns copyright protection people, since +digital copies can be shared.
      • +
    • However, so could filmstock (more on this later), and audiotape, then +videotape and DvD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the +music, movie or television industries. Producing terrible content no-one's +interested in buying's done most of the harm.
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    Let's talk about Hollywood

    +
      +
    • One of the groups that wield the DMCA most is Hollywood, using it to protect +their movies, (currently, for some bizarre reason, from being used in Youtube +videos which would actually raise the profile of their products, but I don't +get how they work, which they either take over, monetise or take down).
      • +
    • Disney in particular have had US Copyright extended specifically to enable +them to retain ownership of their Mickey Mouse character. Loads of content +would now be in the public domain were it not for Disney's desire to retain +ownership of the mouse.
      • + +
    + +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • What's really interesting is how Hollywood started. A group of film makers ran +all the way to California (a long distance at the time) to get away from this +guy, Thomas Edison, and his fim camera patents and copyrights, because his +rights enforcement was so severe it prevented them from making any significant +profit.
      • + +
    + +
    +

    Thomas_Edison.jpg +

    +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • Yet at the same time Edison took the entire catalogue of pioneering french +film maker Georges Méliès, now known as the pioneer of film special effects, +inventing many of those we know today more than a hundred years ago.
      • +
    • By releasing his entire catalogue of movies and taking credit, he stole +millions of dollars from Méliès. Lacking the financial buffer this would have +given him this, among too many pressures to list here, caused him to die +bankrupt Wikipedia page on Méliès
      • + +
    + +
    +

    George_Melies.jpg +

    +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    +
      +
    • One could make the argument the DMCA exist because the US has learned from +their mistakes, but as these mistakes seem to be ongoing, with the oppression +of new artists, and software developers trying to create innovative products, +I doubt this the case.
      • +
    • Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen, in spite of being a billionaire, has filed +patent and copyright infringement cases against Apple, AOL, Facebook, Google, +and anyone his definitely not a patent troll company can find who might be +infringing on one of the many thousands of patents they've managed to buy up.
      • +
    • Since buying thousands of vaguely worded software patents and then suing +companies with them is exactly how patent trolls behave, it's kind of +difficult to think this isn't exactly what they are.
      • + +
    + + + +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    Obligatory XKCD

    + +
    +

    DMCA.png +

    +
    +
      +
    • Copyright:
      • +
    • Mirrored to avoid bandwidth stealing
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    Licence for this work

    +
      +
    • Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 +International by Dr Carey Pridgeon 2020
      • +
    • (Licence does not cover linked images owned by other content creators)
      • + +
    +
    +
    +
    +
    + + + + + + diff --git a/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.org b/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.org index 6709a2b..cadf7be 100644 --- a/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.org +++ b/20-21/Lectures/DMCA.org @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ copyrighted works. - In short, in seeks to prevent the diseminination, *by any means*, of original copyrighted works by anyone but the copyright holder. -- This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or dvd's. +- This includes piracy (obviously), copying videos or DVD's. ** - It's legal to make a copy of any form of media you own, for personal use. However, it is *technically* not legal to circumvent copy protection @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ ** Is The DMCA Fair - One thing it set out to do was remove fair use, because fair use isn't profitable. -- I own a good number of DvDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to +- I own a good number of DVDs. If the full force of the DMCA were allowed to take hold I would be forced to replace my entire collection each time technology advanced to the point my current collection became unusable. This happened to my audio cassettes, and to my video tapes (although both of those wore out through re-use, so we'ren't that good anyway). ** -- Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DvD boxset, can't be so easily +- Some things, like my BBC Shakespeare play DVD boxset, can't be so easily replaced. Others got their soundtracks replaced because obtaining the rights to the original music used again would cost too much for such obscure shows. - If they get re-released at all, why do this when there's streaming now. @@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ - Without private copy rights, Lots of these shows wouldn't be available. Once streaming replaces personal ownership completely, there won't be any option to flick through your old collection. That has more appeal than you might think. -- Mind you, DvD itself is a dead format, private *digital* copies are the future, +- Mind you, DVD itself is a dead format, private *digital* copies are the future, and I think this is what most concerns copyright protection people, since digital copies can be shared. - However, so could filmstock (more on this later), and audiotape, then - videotape and DvD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the + videotape and DVD. None of that, including online piracy, has brought down the music, movie or television industries. Producing terrible content no-one's interested in buying's done most of the harm. ** Let's talk about Hollywood