Skip to content
Permalink
master
Switch branches/tags

Name already in use

A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
# LEAP
LEAP: Local Enumeration And Privesc. Framework for 4061CEM project.
## What is here?
Not much.
This project requires you to generate most of the actual code
yourselves. To start with, each team should work on a fork of this
repository together to define the common features of the individual
pieces of functionality - we'll refer to them as "plugins". This is a
kind of **design by contract**, which you can read about here:
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/design-by-contract>. Some
things to decide might be:
- Will each piece of functionality be in a separate file or subdirectory?
- Will your team have a naming convention? For example, maybe all
windows enumerators will begin with "wEnum_", linux with "lEnum_"
and so on.
- What will each function return or display? Will each function
print out to the user? Or will it return a block of text in a
string? Or a list of lines? Or maybe a dict with some meta-info
(version, plugin name, plugin author, date, time, etc.) and text
data? Or JSON? All are possibilities.
- Will you have a standard set of parameters to be passed in? Or can
each plugin have a different set of required parameters?
- What plugins will be implemented? Who will be the author?
You should document these decisions here in the `README.md` file. Once
you are all happy with this, stage, commit and push it to your shared
fork. Then, each team member can begin writing their own tool by
creating an individual fork or using branching. Naming your tool
something sensible and uniquely identifiable at this point will be
very helpful. If you all keep the simple name "LEAP", you will might
it tricky to remember which repository you are working on later. You
can call your own fork whatever you like.
When the individual tools are working and each team member has their
own plugins working, it is their responsibility to liaise with the
other members of the team to import the other plugins. Each team
member should create a fork of the repositories of each of their
team-mates, integrate their plugins and submit a pull-request for each
fork. If using branches, then each team member can merge into their
branch from either the master (if any system changes are made) or from
other users' forks (to incorporate their plugins).
If using forks, with team members being A, B, C and D, they will have
one fork to start with in which the team collaborates on defining the
basics. Then A will create a personal fork of the shared repository
and work on their tool and plugins. When they're done, they will
create forks from their team-mate's repositories. Let's call them
LEAP-B, LEAP-C and LEAP-D. A will then port their plugins to each of
these new forks and submit pull requests for them to be merged into
the repositories of their teammates.
## Why?
This might seem overly complex, but it's not. In reality, this is one
of the common ways people collaborate using git. You can fork any
public project and work on your own copy without needing to ask
permission or get added to the original repo, then if you want to
recommend your changes to the original author you create a pull
request and they can decide to merge it into their work or not.
In this project you will be getting experience of working on a project
and receiving multiple pull-requests from contributors and at the same
time, contributing to the repositories of others.
# Your Submission
Key points for submission:
- You should submit your work through Aula as a PDF.
- We will be marking anonymously, so try not to identify yourself in
the report. Use a pseudonym or redact any code or screenshots that
includes your name.
- In the information on the repository, provide a screenshot of the
sequence of commits as well as a link to your final commit. You can
find this information from the github.coventry.ac.uk web interface
by clicking on the "X commits" button: ![commit button](./commit.png)
- Do not use screenshots for code. You can format your code for Word
using a tool such as the
<http://www.planetb.ca/syntax-highlight-word> website
- And **definitely** do not take photographs of your screen in order to show code
- Make sure you include **ALL** of the source code required for your
submission in appendices. This includes the code imported from your
group members.
- But **also** make it clear which parts are **not** yours.
- The easiest method is to have a section showing **just your
code** and the full code as an appendix.
- Each person should have their own privesc and enumeration code as
well as the privescs and enumerations of their group. You should
not be developing these components as a group.
- For the basic task, **you can** share the menu code or use the one
provided, modified as required.
- For the intermediate tasks onward, you should make **your own
modifications or alternative menu code**. This means you can work
on the same base as your group, but add your own modifications
**not shared with your group** in order to achieve the later tasks.
- If your group failed to work together, you can still show you
incorporated the work of others. The **phantom member** branch of
the master LEAP repository
(<https://github.coventry.ac.uk/CUEH/LEAP/tree/phantom_member>) can
be used as a source. Imagine this is the code of a member of your
group and use the privesc and enumeration classes that it contains
to add to your tool. You may need to make modifications, just as
you might with members of your group, if you have diverged from the
shared menu system. This is expected if you are attempting the
intermediate or advanced tasks.
## Suggested Report Outline
This is just a suggestion.
1. Introduction.
- Explain the tool. What is it's purpose?
2. User documentation
- How do we run this? How do we operate it?
3. Unit Tests
- A table of the tests you created. Like last time: <https://github.coventry.ac.uk/pages/CUEH/4061CEM/assessment/cw1/example.html#org1514c40>
4. Plugins
- What plugins did **you** create?
- What plugins did **your team members** create?
5. Repository
- A screenshot of your commits, demonstrating your sequence of
development and where you incorporated group-members' code
- A link to the repository
5. Appendix A: Your Code
- This is the code that is **yours**. If you used code from other
sources in this section, make clear which parts and where it came
from. This includes things from web-pages and the code you were
given in the master repo
6. Appendix B: All source code
- Include all source code here, including that which comes from your
team for plugins. Again, make sure to highlight the source of any
code that is not yours. You can simply say that your team
contributions are from "team members" in order to maintain
anonymity.